News

House approves bill to sell state's liquor wholesale system

HARRISBURG, Pa. — The way in which Pennsylvanians purchase wine and spirits may be changing.

House Republicans on Tuesday pushed ahead a set of changes to how alcohol is sold in the state, moving to privatize wholesale wine and spirits sales and expand the retail outlets where alcohol is available.

Lawmakers voted 105-84 in favor of the wholesale divestment proposal, sending it with other proposals to the Senate for its consideration.

TRENDING NOW:

DOWNLOAD OUR FREE NEWS APP

The House voted to allow more grocery stores to seek permits to sell wine, no longer restricting the permits to stores with seating capacity, and retailers would be able to buy wine from brokers in the private sector.

"Every day that passes that we're not able to continue to update our antiquated liquor systems is another day of missed opportunities," said Rep. Bryan Cutler, R-Lancaster.

Rep. Joe Markosek, a Democrat from Allegheny County, said the change would help businesses at the expense of taxpayers, because state stores would have to compete with grocery stores that can focus on just the most popular varieties.

"If there ever was a template on how to crash a business and hurt taxpayers, this is it," Markosek said.

Representatives also approved letting restaurant and hotel licensees sell up to 3 liters (almost 1 gallon) of takeout liquor per customer.

Another measure would allow privately owned retail liquor stores, an expansion designed to fill gaps in the state that are not adequately served by the 600 stores of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board.

Markosek, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said new fees collected under the wholesale divestment bill would be less than the liquor system currently provides to state coffers. He also warned that driving the system out of business would put about 5,000 people out of work and add to the state pension system's debt.

Carlow University economics professor Gene Ney said privatizing wine and liquor stores could have a major impact on current employees in the long term. Ney said that if private companies come in, they will seek to cut costs.

"They may be in a situation where they are no longer union employees. They may not make the money they are making," he said.

Ney said he's paying close attention to the state's next move because he owns a tavern in Oakland and he's concerned that his alcohol expenses might go up.

Supporters of the measure said the state-store workers would find jobs in the private stores.

"This is not a shiny new asset," said Rep. George Dunbar, R-Westmoreland. "This is an asset that's old and tired and needs to be retired."

Stay with Channel 11 News and WPXI.com for continuing coverage.

 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.